Comments Posted By PC VA BEACH
Displaying 1 To 7 Of 7 Comments
LOOSE LIPS SINKING AL QAEDA IN IRAQ?
Another Crown Forum Sellout
"Chapter 12 - Like We're Supposed To Care?
I have never seen children enjoying their incurable diseases so much.
It seems to be all the rage for witches of want with a so-called "terrible illness" to try and turn their maladies into some sort of whining, cause-celeb begathon for medicines and research to cure their condition or relieve their pain."
I see a lot of aupport in here for Coulter...you all can be damn proud!! I mean really, is this how you all want to be defined? Bitter angry obnoxious bloviators who pick on widows and sick kids. Maybe next year your agenda of flag burning and stopping gay marriage will be put into the Constitution...naw. And let us not forget, the "Sodomized virgin" exception in South Dakota. Once upon a time, I voted for Reagan and Bush. Then came Teri Schaivo. Never again. CONGRATULATIONS!
Comment Posted By PC VA BEACH On 11.06.2006 @ 11:04
We'll win in the middle east when we raise an army large enough to fight the regional war there.
That will happen, eventually. Republican or Democrat in control. Just not with these guys in charge now who took the golden opportunity to build a huge army, and blew it.
Good people… until we raise the army, and project the power needed to control the region, the rest of this foolish talk is just smoke and mirrors. Reagan would have raised an army.
Comment Posted By PC VA BEACH On 10.06.2006 @ 12:26
SPINNING THEIR WAY TO DEFEAT IN NOVEMBER
Andy-
Comment Posted By PC VA BEACH On 11.06.2006 @ 16:59
You cannot get past the fact that we are running around Iraq putting out fires because we do not have the occupying force size to take and hold the signifigant urban areas, nation build and field a large enough QRF. We had a grace period after the fall of Saddam, and had we filled the void boots on the ground, SOF forces training Iraqi soldiers and Army Coprs of Eng/Navy Seabees hiring Iraqi men to rebuild the infrastructure this would have been a done deal. We still cannot get around the fact that the majority our Shiites, that one, we are stuck with.
You state that we did not have the army to field at the time of the invasion.... true. But if GW had stood on the rubble of the WTC and made a speech that mobilized the nation, with stated goals in recruiting and building, we could have done it easily. That is what I am talking about Andy. We could have gotten back to Reagan levels in less than a year,and pressed foreward from there.
Spilled milk you say. Hell bro, utter icompetence. These jokers have the reverse midas touch. Everything they get their handson turns to mudd. They run the gov like a campaign, they do not govern. Corruption abounds. It is a disgrace.
Andy-
Comment Posted By PC VA BEACH On 11.06.2006 @ 13:25
Well stated. We particularly cannot win without the proper # of troops to set security. Had we invaded with the 500-700k needed to set up a stable infrustructure, we would have gained Iaqi populace "buy in". Not a doubt in my mind that we would be singing a different tune, and achieving our power projection in a region that threatens our national interests and security. I find it very strange that members of the party of Ronald Reagan still support this incompetence. Basically, the Republicans have become the party of "religious conservatives" rather than the party of a strong defense and fiscal discipline. Make no mistake about it, Ann Coulter defines the party of which I was once a member.
One last time. We will win in the Middle East when we raise an army large enough to fight a regional war. Until then, the rest of these side bar debates are just smoke and mirrors.
Good people...until we raise the army, and project the power needed to control the region, the rest of this foolish talk is just smoke and mirrors. Reagan would have raised an army.
Comment Posted By PC VA BEACH On 10.06.2006 @ 12:20
ANN COULTER: CONSERVATIVE LOUT
""She is stunningly, inexorably and amusingly, reasonable. She’s also brave, and funny. She’s not afraid to throw the left’s outrageousness right back at them. The reaction tells the tale.""
Yeah, right.
What she is a hack who uses her position in the media to attack widows and orphans, instead of making an argument based on the merits of the 9/11 comission and the Administrations response to it. She herself made a point using her lost friend Olsen right after the attack. 9/11 was a personal tragedy for her, so she referenced it, she lost a friend. Now she is appalled that these women who lost their childrens fathers in the attack would have the gaul to have a opinion about it, and our security? PULEEEESE!
Comment Posted By PC VA BEACH On 11.06.2006 @ 18:07
Zardoz has it right. She speaks for the republican base, that, most people agree on. Most pundits are defending her rhetoric. Enjoy your new found poster child.
Laughable. Coulter, Ingram, Rush- so filled with hate and lies, that it is unreal. Your Politics have become a sick joke. You all seem "oh so shocked" that the "base" has gotten away from you. Enjoy the hatred that has been sold as patriotism. Maybe next year, you will get your flag burning and gay marriage ammendments, and while you are at it, make the South Dakota "Sodomized Virgin" exception,the law of the land! Perhaps you will get another shot at Teri Schiavo? All while you spend more than ever, on every piece of fraud and pork on the books. Reagan would have built an army, by the way. One large enough to win the regional war we have gotten ourselves into. CONGRATULATIONS..your "base" has taken over.
Comment Posted By PC VA BEACH On 10.06.2006 @ 12:11
